Inside the Supreme Court’s Corruption Scandal
A corruption crisis has erupted in the Supreme Court surrounding Justice Monroe’s alleged interactions with tech company Socialite, of whom Monroe has ruled in favor multiple times throughout his decade-long tenure.
The FBI reports alleged financial interactions taking place on offshore accounts as well as email correspondence revealing a relationship between Monroe and the CEO of Socialite.
Monroe offered no comment but under testimony denied hating America. Socialite claims “no wrongdoing” but declining stock prices indicate low public faith. The Supreme Court’s justices as a whole were characterized by investigators of being elitist and believing themselves untouchable. Justices identifying themselves as “friends” with Monroe were held under suspicion by investigators.
Those against Monroe provided prosecution via physical evidence brought in from his purchases. These items included what the prosecution claimed were Monroe’s edibles and pregnancy test as well as evidence of food purchased for “brothel parties” as described by the team. These purchases were believed to be made in his association with the ‘unknown’ funds disclosed on his bank as given to him by the “lactose intolerant wives of the CEOs,” says the team. These purchases alongside the stock evidence and believed “close relationship” involving Monroe and Socialite CEO were the basis of their argument, claiming that his actions were “corruption that extends far beyond.”
Monroe’s defense lawyers dramatically claimed that Monroe had cancer and that some of his purchases – Costco Wholesale, Sloppy Joe’s – were a last-days spending spree, and also used this rationale to justify the alleged sexual behavior alluded to by the prosecution. When pressed as to whether the corruption allegations against Monroe were true, the defense refused to say. Instead, they pressed on the hedging journalistic diction of the original reports, seizing on the words “believed” and “allegedly” to demonstrate the lack of proof.
This article was written by Mackenzie Temple and Julia Critz.
